Chris Kruger recently retired as Group Chief Technology Officer (CTO) for Momentum Metropolitan Holdings, a position he held for 25 years. A long time for a leader in any field, and several lifetimes in Tech. As his parting gesture, Chris was asked to share some of his insights on what today’s tech leaders need to know.
One size doesn’t fit all
Today, the terms CIO and CTO are commonplace, but the role of technology leadership is far from uniform: It varies by industry, strategy, firm culture and operating model.
Over the years my role was shaped by taking many perspectives into account. – With input from the CEO, business and IT colleagues – technology became a platform for innovation. When there was an innovation lag, the results were friction: ownership gaps or overlaps that blurred accountability and stifled delivery.
The need for role clarity is something I’ve underestimated. I’ve seen vague or miscast remits cut short the careers of some good Chief Information Officers (CIOs).
Those anxious to impress can lean into their key business relationships, only to find that their own organisation needs time to catch up. Some pursue innovation at all costs but lose face when they can’t keep the lights on. Innovation – and CIO reputations – are each built on sound technology foundations.
I came to view the arrival of a new CEO as my own “first 90-days”: Taking pains to get their intent, and to explain our plans, challenges and ways of work. The pace of technological innovation today is rapid and exponential. Every business in every industry will continue to feel the impact. Buy-in and support for the role of the CTO is crucial for success. The process will also need to be repeated if there are leadership changes within the business.
Know yourself
Some of these pitfalls arise because it’s a big job with blurred edges. But it also comes down to self-knowledge. The ability to know your strengths, and frankly acknowledge your limits. To design your role in a way that plays to the first, then through the right relationships and structures, make good your limitations.
Technology, and being a CTO, is primarily about people: businesses cannot buy innovation by buying technology – it should serve as an enabler to allow people to innovate and do their jobs better. Talent is the key to successful businesses, and understanding your own strengths and weaknesses, as well as those of your team and partners, is vital. Tech must make it better or easier for people. Crucially CTOs further need to prioritise building the IT talent pipeline in South Africa.
Candour and trust
I’ve been fortunate enough to work with some of the best leaders in financial services. But not one of them would save you if you’d lost the confidence of the business units (BUs).
Instead, our leaders have given strategic clarity, instilled belief in our right to succeed, and helped foster a culture of trust among leaders: The knowledge that your peers are up to the job, and act in good faith. That makes a world of difference to IT leadership.
Liberating business without losing control
There are good reasons why firms centralise (or not): Momentum Metropolitan has deliberately chosen a federated business operating model. A decision made when Momentum was a financial services upstart, and one that the company has never regretted. In practice, that means putting technology capability at the point of maximum impact, while sharing when there’s a clear case grounded in shared gain, cost or compliance.
Done well, a federated operating model can give a business great clarity. Clarity of responsibility for business delivery, revenue generation, and cost accountability. When our former CEO chose federation again, it provided a straight view of the markets we compete for, the clients we serve, and partners on whom we rely.
Through boom and bust
Our operating approach is one reason for my longevity. Because technology implementation teams sit in BUs (with a CIO close to business leadership), most IT spend is viewed through a business lens: There’s less risk of a disconnect between means and ends. We keep central teams “light”: Both their value and costs are clear. They exist by agreement, and in a downturn, there’s less fat to cut. We co-opt good people from business units to support central strategic themes. Strategy becomes “the sum of us” vs. “something done to us”.
That said, some responsibilities sit squarely on the shoulders of a CTO.
The big bets: judgment and timing
In a federated system, there are still limits on autonomy. Some platform, product and system choices have far-reaching consequences – across businesses and over time.
To get them right, you need to know which technologies or partners are likely to stand the test of time, how they expand or constrain our strategic choices, and what they mean for our operating approach.
We have good IT and Platform executive committees to help make those decisions, and sound principles to help such as “Know when to evolve, build or buy”. But in the end, the buck always had to stop with me. And if a decision falls short, so does the blame. This was never simple, and it’s harder now. The big cloud vendors have great strengths, but look set to repeat mistakes made by IBM, Oracle and others. Some new architectures will long outlive the firms that gave rise to them.
External innovation
Insurers embarked on digitisation twenty years ago, but progress was slow. Today, the channel is a hotbed of digital innovation, and the potential for market disruption is very real.
It was my role as CTO to grasp what digital innovation will do to our businesses and the markets in which they compete. That clearly implies a deep understanding of the big tech themes: the cloud; data and analytics; AI and machine learning; blockchain and IoT technologies. But it really gets interesting when those forces converge to upend markets or transform productivity.
I found that it wasn’t enough to read the big consultancies and research houses. There were some diamonds in the rough, but it took time and effort to find them. Too much of the work lacked industry focus, and was written for big, centralised firms (implicitly, in the US or Europe).
Join us for a
Chat over coffee
In this challenging environment, clients need a
coach and a financial plan to help them guide their
emotions to achieve better financial outcomes.
Consult by Momentum has a value offering to
partner with you on your journey as we believe in
the value of advice.
Contact us on hello@consultm.co.za for more information or join us: www.consultm.co.za/join-us
Momentum Consult (Pty) Ltd is an authorised financial services provider (FSP5503), a subsidiary of Momentum Metropolitan Strategic Investments (Pty) Ltd, and rated B-BBEE level 1.
We gained more value from boutique research firms that tracked innovation in the best of our peers (in- and outside insurance) worldwide, but bought that insight directly to bear on our markets in SA.
In the end, it is context that counts. As you’ll see from any innovation pipeline or venture fund, most big banks and insurers have a stake in the same or similar technologies. But knowing how and when they will land their punch in your firm is another matter. It was my role to ensure that business CEOs grasped what digital innovation could do for them, and had the capabilities to deliver it.
Software engineering: Our DNA
Digital innovation today cuts across the whole insurance value chain, from product design and delivery, through pricing and underwriting, sales, service and claims management.
We’re creating digital foundations that let us tap new business ecosystems and meet our clients wherever they may be. To do so, requires new capabilities. Critically, it requires that we excel at software engineering. Like other financial services firms, Momentum Metropolitan has been adopting the software engineering culture and operating practices of the best software companies. Not as a monolithic enterprise function, but in focused product or “fusion” teams that can iterate fast.
This is not software engineering for the sake of it, but software that solves problems our clients and intermediaries have, and can differentiate us. And while great engineers are vital, you need people who really get the customer and can drive market uptake. All rare skills, but the teams are already paying dividends: based on results, and by exposing a rich pool of new leadership talent.
Oversight vs. obstruction
IT oversight is essential, but it can easily become a stick to beat business with.
We established shared operating principles by which we live, and made available the help (from experienced leaders to niche experts) our businesses needed and agreed to follow. We put in place IT, Architecture and Platform Excos that enfranchised BUs in IT oversight, and helped form a shared view of good practice.
In a federation, you locate each capability for maximum impact. You do not centralise for the sake of it, or duplicate things without good reason, but you accept that federation may lead to some duplication.
What’s next?
Technology is going to continue to advance, and successful CTOs are going to need to be adaptive and flexible to advance with it, to synergise with strategy and create business value.
For myself, some opportunities beckon, but I’ve chosen to work with an advisory firm I came to trust and respect. And through them, to help other banks and insurers make digital innovation count.